For the first time in world history John Benneth defines the amazing mechanism of homeopathy, the actual physical nanostructures within homeopathic solutions that emit the electro-magnetic signals which give homeopathic medicine its powMontaignier: Electromagnetic Signals Are Produced by Aqueous Nanostructures Derived from Bacterial DNA Seq Homeopathy excels at treating 1 condition. That condition is dehydration. If you have the names of any papers that are in a generally accep Why does homeopathy fail under EVERY empirical test?
IT HAS BEEN DEMONSTRATED, repeatedly, ad nauseam, BIOCHEMICALLY, producing the same specific or similar effects in millions of people 4 over 2 centuries! You accuse us of being illogical, then you go off the rails telling lies & making assumptions, accusations that are prima facie illogical. How do you know what YOU know? There's not 1 study, test or trial that shows what opponents of h-pathy claim. Show me! The argument against it always ends up destroying itself.
This seems like stuff only a handful of people in the world can even begin to understand. It seems to have not have been tested yet to the extent that it should. It seems groundbreaking, while it has been used for ceturies. Above everything else, at this point and time in history it seems unbeliaveble. Procure studies that can build consensus among a community of experts before you publicise something ridiculously unbelievable to common people.
Why does EVERY conclusion by every scientific body of many nations say it does no better than placebo?
ted peer reviewed journal, I would be THRILLED to see it.IT HAS BEEN DEMONSTRATED, repeatedly, ad nauseam, BIOCHEMICALLY, producing the same specific or similar effects in millions of people 4 over 2 centuries! You accuse us of being illogical, then you go off the rails telling lies & making assumptions, accusations that are prima facie illogical. How do you know what YOU know? There's not 1 study, test or trial that shows what opponents of h-pathy claim. Show me! The argument against it always ends up destroying itself.
This seems like stuff only a handful of people in the world can even begin to understand. It seems to have not have been tested yet to the extent that it should. It seems groundbreaking, while it has been used for ceturies. Above everything else, at this point and time in history it seems unbeliaveble. Procure studies that can build consensus among a community of experts before you publicise something ridiculously unbelievable to common people.
V. Elia, E. Napoli, R. Germano, The ‘Memory of Water’: an almost deciphered enigma. Dissipative structures in extremely dilute aqueous solutions, Homeopathy, Volume 96, Issue 3, July 2007, Pages 163-169, ISSN 1475-4916, 10.1016/j.homp.2007.05.007. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1475491607000689) Abstract: In the last decade, we have investigated from the physicochemical point of view, whether water prepared by the procedures of homeopathic medicine (leading inexorably to systems without any molecule different from the solvent) results in water different from the initial water? The answer, unexpectedly, but strongly supported by many experimental results is positive. We used well-established physicochemical techniques: flux calorimetry, conductometry, pHmetry and galvanic cell electrodes potential. Unexpectedly the physicochemical parameters evolve in time. The water solvent exhibits large changes in measurable physicochemical properties as a function of its history, the solute previously dissolved, and time. In particular we found evidence of two new phenomena, both totally unpredicted, in homeopathic dilutions: the presence of a maximum in the measured physicochemical parameters vs sample age, and their dependence on the volume in which the dilution is stored. These new experimental results strongly suggest the presence of an extended and ‘ordered’ dynamics involving liquid water molecules. Keywords: homeopathy; calorimetry; conductivity; pH; dissipative structures
No comments:
Post a Comment